The Future of AI App Building Explained (n8n + Supabase + Lovable)
Description
Learn and develop your skills in our FREE NoCode/AI Community (NEW): https://www.skool.com/nocode-agency-hub/about
🌐 Work with APG
Website: www.apgsoftware.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/apgsoftware
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/apgsoftwaresolutions/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/apg-software-solutions
▶️ Connect with me
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adamfreelances/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adamfreelances
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-goodyer/
Consult with me: https://cal.com/apgsoftware/consult
🌐 The Future of NoCode: Lovable, n8n & Supabase 🔮
In this video, we dive into the exciting frontier of NoCode development powered by Lovable, n8n, and Supabase — a trio that's reshaping how apps are built. We'll explore:
🚀 The current state of these emerging tools and how they differ from classic Low-Code platforms like Bubble.
🔍 Strengths and weaknesses: When to use Lovable vs. n8n vs. Supabase depending on your app’s needs.
💡 Real use-cases and ideal apps for each stack.
🔮 What the future of NoCode might look like: is it still “no code” if AI does the coding? 😉
Whether you're a solo maker, startup founder, or automation nerd, this is your guide to staying ahead in the fast-moving world of app development — without writing a single line of code.
🌐 Work with APG
Website: www.apgsoftware.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/apgsoftware
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/apgsoftwaresolutions/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/apg-software-solutions
▶️ Connect with me
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adamfreelances/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adamfreelances
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-goodyer/
Consult with me: https://cal.com/apgsoftware/consult
🌐 The Future of NoCode: Lovable, n8n & Supabase 🔮
In this video, we dive into the exciting frontier of NoCode development powered by Lovable, n8n, and Supabase — a trio that's reshaping how apps are built. We'll explore:
🚀 The current state of these emerging tools and how they differ from classic Low-Code platforms like Bubble.
🔍 Strengths and weaknesses: When to use Lovable vs. n8n vs. Supabase depending on your app’s needs.
💡 Real use-cases and ideal apps for each stack.
🔮 What the future of NoCode might look like: is it still “no code” if AI does the coding? 😉
Whether you're a solo maker, startup founder, or automation nerd, this is your guide to staying ahead in the fast-moving world of app development — without writing a single line of code.
Summary
The Future of AI App Building Explained: n8n + Supabase + Lovable
In this insightful video, Adam, founder of APG Software, breaks down the rapidly evolving landscape of AI-powered app development tools that are revolutionizing how applications are built. As a veteran in the low-code and AI space with over 250 completed projects, Adam provides expert analysis on emerging technologies like Lovable, Bolt, and Cursor, comparing them to traditional low-code platforms.
The video explores how these new AI builders excel at rapid prototyping, allowing founders to generate functional MVPs in minutes rather than months. A key advantage is that these tools provide access to source code, eliminating the vendor lock-in concerns that many startup founders face with traditional low-code platforms like Bubble. This is particularly valuable for startups seeking investment, as they maintain ownership of their codebase.
Adam distinguishes between different use cases, explaining that SaaS applications and two-sided marketplaces may benefit more from AI builders paired with scalable backends like Supabase, while internal tools and CRMs might still be better served by traditional no-code platforms due to their visual workflow capabilities and simplified management.
The most valuable insight comes when Adam reveals his recommended tech stack for the future: Lovable for front-end development, Supabase for database management, and n8n for backend workflows. This combination offers the perfect balance of modern interfaces, scalable infrastructure, and visual workflow management while remaining optimized for AI integration.
Throughout the video, Adam candidly discusses both the potential and limitations of these tools, noting that while AI builders can get projects to "0.8" quickly, scaling beyond initial users remains challenging for non-technical founders. He highlights concerns around AI errors, debugging difficulties, and data privacy issues that currently exist but expects these to diminish as large language models improve.
For developers, agencies, and entrepreneurs looking to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving app development landscape, this video provides crucial insights into which tools to learn and how to position services for the coming AI-powered development revolution.
Transcript
0:00
Hello everyone. In this video, I'm going
0:02
to take you through some of these new AI
0:04
builders that are blowing up on social
0:05
media right now. I'm talking about tools
0:07
like Lovable, Bolt, and Cursor. I'm
0:10
going to talk you through exactly what
0:11
they are, how I think you can use them
0:13
the best, and what I think is FUD and
0:15
what is actually gold and something that
0:17
you should really take note of to make
0:18
the most of this booming industry, which
0:20
I think is going to 10 times at least in
0:23
the next year alone. If you're not
0:24
familiar with who I am, my name is Adam.
0:26
I'm a top-rated freelancer on Upwork,
0:28
which is where I started my AI and low
0:30
code career. Doing over 50 projects
0:31
there and becoming expert vetted, I
0:33
transitioned into a global low code
0:35
development agency called APG Software.
0:37
And since then, we've developed over 250
0:39
projects in the low code and AI space
0:41
for clients all over the globe. So, I've
0:43
been in this industry for a while. I'm
0:45
pretty familiar with some of the ways
0:47
that people are building these products
0:48
in rapid time frames. And I wanted to
0:50
give you my opinion on exactly what
0:52
these tools are and where I think
0:54
they're going to be headed. So, the way
0:55
I've laid this out is we've got our new
0:57
AI builders on the right of this
0:59
whiteboard here. And I'm going to talk
1:00
through what they are, the benefits,
1:03
some of the trade-offs that exist there
1:04
right now. I'm going to compare that to
1:06
some of the traditional ways of building
1:08
things and also some of the low code
1:10
ways which work and still are really
1:12
popular, but why I think this is
1:14
beneficial in certain areas and this
1:16
approach is beneficial for other areas.
1:18
And then I'll talk you through what I
1:20
think we're going to end up with for
1:22
building really scalable rapid
1:23
applications in the next year or so. So
1:25
I'll go through walk you through the
1:27
pros and cons of each of these and then
1:28
talk through what I think the best stack
1:30
is going to be in the future. And if
1:32
you're someone that's looking to get
1:33
into this space and learn some tools,
1:35
I'd really recommend exploring this kind
1:36
of combination. Now to start off with,
1:39
let's talk about these tools, what
1:41
they're useful for, and can you actually
1:42
build million-doll applications that can
1:44
scale on these tools. Now, what these
1:46
tools are really, really good for is
1:48
rapid prototyping. Now, if you've played
1:50
around with any of these tools and
1:51
you've put a wellthoughtout prompt into
1:53
a tool like Lovable, you'll see a pretty
1:55
incredible response come out. You'll get
1:58
a number of pages generated. They'll be
1:59
mobile responsive. You can click around
2:01
in there and those prototypes used to
2:03
take months just to build. So, what used
2:05
to take months can be done in around
2:08
about a minute these days. And so, this
2:10
is really, really powerful. Now, there's
2:12
a lot of benefits to this and I think
2:13
this is really going to shake up the MVP
2:16
development industry in general and
2:17
there's a number of reasons why
2:18
something like this is preferable to
2:21
what used to be what low code tools are
2:23
used for which was rapid prototyping and
2:25
MVP development. The benefits of this
2:27
over using tool like bubble to build an
2:30
MVP are you get access to your source
2:32
code. Now, we work with a lot of startup
2:33
founders, a lot of which have investors
2:36
or they're in some sort of startup
2:38
accelerator, and having access to the
2:40
source code is really important for them
2:42
because if they were to scale to a
2:43
million-doll application, they don't
2:45
want to be locked into a vendor and not
2:46
have access to their own source code.
2:48
So, whilst I love Bubble, I think it's a
2:50
really powerful tool. One of the things
2:51
that scares a lot of founders from using
2:54
a tool like this is the fact that they
2:56
don't have access to their own source
2:57
code. And if something was to happen to
2:59
a company like Bubble, it may damage
3:01
their application. Now, I don't think
3:03
this is a big issue for anyone that's
3:05
trying to scale an app, and there's a
3:06
million ways you can get around
3:07
something like that. A lot of companies
3:09
trust big CRM platforms and all sorts of
3:12
big platforms to store their data. I
3:14
think that's really something that
3:15
you're going to have to sacrifice in
3:16
your company in some way or another. But
3:18
in saying that, for building a an
3:21
application, this is a really big plus.
3:23
In addition to that, you could make some
3:25
pretty rapid iterations. So you can put
3:26
it out for feedback and these AI
3:28
builders can make changes rapidly. And I
3:30
actually think that pretty soon founders
3:32
will not need software agencies to do
3:34
this MVP testing stage. So typically
3:37
what happens is a founder gets funding,
3:39
they approach a software development
3:40
agency, they go this is our idea and the
3:42
software development agency gets that
3:44
idea and builds the MVP because founders
3:47
often are not that techsavvy and they
3:49
don't know how to convert their idea
3:50
into a tech product. This is going to
3:52
change the game because they can use
3:54
natural language to prompt to some sort
3:56
of AI tool and get an MVP without
3:59
needing the input of a software agency
4:00
at all. Now, there are some red flags
4:02
and I'll talk about that in a second,
4:04
but MVP development and validating ideas
4:07
is about to be something that's
4:08
accessible to anybody and can be done in
4:11
just a couple of minutes, which is an
4:13
absolute gamecher to how things have
4:15
been operating for the past 20 years.
4:17
And what low code solutions like bubble
4:20
were trying to do was enable people who
4:22
had no tech skills to build apps. In
4:24
saying that though tech is very
4:26
complicated and if you don't understand
4:27
the fundamentals of how tech works, you
4:30
are still going to have trouble using
4:31
building scalable applications using a
4:33
tool like bubble because it gives you
4:35
the customization to build scalable apps
4:37
but you need to understand how to set
4:39
tech up properly because what you can
4:41
easily do if you're not familiar with
4:42
tech is build what they call spaghetti
4:44
code or spaghetti apps. So apps that are
4:46
built in a way that is not scalable and
4:48
workflows and and your database
4:50
structure and everything is not built in
4:52
a scalable way and early stage founders
4:54
who haven't been in the tech industry
4:55
for a while tend to make a lot of those
4:57
critical mistakes. And what I can see
4:58
happening here is that being magnified
5:01
because these founders are generating
5:03
applications. They don't actually
5:04
understand what's being done in the
5:06
background. They don't understand the
5:07
code that they're generating. And so
5:09
whilst this is going to be awesome for
5:10
building MVPs, building scalable
5:13
applications on top of that is where the
5:14
challenge is going to be. And so what
5:16
I've done up here is I've said 0 to 0.8
5:19
very very quickly, which is awesome. And
5:21
for getting just a couple users in your
5:23
local area or validating a market with
5:25
some beta users, this is probably going
5:27
to be enough. But from getting from 10
5:30
users to 100, a,000, 10,000, whatever
5:33
the case is, that's going to be a real
5:35
challenge on tools like Lovable Bolt and
5:37
Cursor at the moment. Now, I'm not
5:38
saying that that's not going to change
5:39
possibly in the next couple months, but
5:41
currently for a founder that has no tech
5:43
skills, they can get to here and then
5:46
they have to hire traditional tech team
5:47
and it's going to be slower from that
5:49
point forward. And some of the things to
5:51
be aware of when building with these
5:52
tools, one is AI errors and rabbit
5:55
holes. So, people that are building with
5:57
this, you can build really, really
5:59
quickly, but you don't understand the
6:01
code that's happening behind the scenes
6:03
and the way certain processes are being
6:05
undertaken. And what can happen there is
6:07
you can have some pretty serious issues
6:09
with privacy. So data privacy, who can
6:12
view what data, what data is being
6:14
exposed in the client, what data is not
6:15
being exposed in the client, where data
6:17
is being sent. You might be making a
6:19
number of API requests and you don't
6:21
actually understand what data is being
6:23
sent and received, what's being exposed
6:24
and what's not. So I can see a lot of
6:26
issues popping up at least at the moment
6:28
in the privacy space. And next up is
6:30
rabbit holes with the AI agent. Now you
6:32
might build 0 to 0.8, But then when
6:34
you're trying to set up possibly a third
6:36
party connection to let's say Stripe for
6:38
example or you're trying to make small
6:40
changes sometimes the AI can get really
6:42
confused and it can have trouble
6:44
debugging your issue and fixing your
6:46
code and this leaves founders pretty
6:48
helpless because they're sitting there
6:50
with a whole stack of code that they
6:52
have no idea how it works and being able
6:54
to debug these things is really really
6:56
difficult. So, as the LLMs get better at
6:58
writing code, this issue is going to get
7:00
smaller and smaller and smaller, but it
7:02
does exist currently. And at the end of
7:04
the day, you're still using code. And
7:06
this is what I'm going to talk about in
7:07
terms of the future I think this is
7:09
going. But at the end of the day, you're
7:11
still using code. And software
7:12
developers are expensive. And building
7:14
with code is expensive. The reason for
7:17
that is because it's still slower to
7:19
build with code than to build with
7:20
visual development interfaces like
7:22
Bubble has, especially for its back end.
7:24
It's a lot easier to visually look at
7:26
bubbles backend workflows and understand
7:28
exactly what's happening than to look at
7:31
some code and understand exactly how
7:32
that's performing. So this still has the
7:35
advantage in that space. So to talk
7:37
about where I think app development is
7:39
going to go between these two approaches
7:42
to building apps in the future is I
7:45
think we have three different kinds of
7:46
apps. We have SAS applications. We have
7:49
what I call two-sided marketplaces. And
7:52
we have internal tools and CRM. Almost
7:54
all of the apps that comes through our
7:55
agency door is one of those three
7:57
categories. And in my opinion, I think
7:59
SAS applications and two-sided
8:02
marketplaces will start to get built
8:04
more on tools like Lovable, Bolt, and
8:06
Cursor than on tools like Bubble. And
8:08
the reason for that is because these
8:09
apps are really hit and miss. A lot of
8:11
these apps fail in the first 5 years
8:13
because they're really difficult to get
8:15
off the ground. But if they do get off
8:17
the ground, they can often scale to
8:18
hundreds of thousands or millions of
8:20
users. And so having access to a
8:22
scalable tech stack like Superbase and
8:25
using Lovable for your front end is
8:27
going to be more preferred by founders
8:29
than being locked into some sort of tool
8:32
like Bubble, not getting access to their
8:34
source code and having to deal with a
8:37
backend that is not as efficient as
8:39
something like Superbase and doesn't
8:40
scale as well price-wise. So, I think
8:43
we're going to see MVPs for SAS
8:45
applications and two-sided marketplaces
8:48
going to be really common in this space.
8:50
Where I think tools like Bubble still
8:52
have the advantage is for internal tools
8:54
and CRM. And the reason for that is
8:57
internal tools and CRM typically have a
8:59
couple hundred users, but they're not
9:00
trying to scale to millions of users
9:02
because it's kept internal to a company
9:04
and they're just supposed to process a
9:06
company's internal operations. And
9:08
what's really important in a company's
9:09
internal operations is exactly how the
9:11
data is moved around and stored. And
9:13
what bubble and no code tools still have
9:15
a large advantage over over these tools
9:18
like lovable bolt and cursor is one you
9:21
get truly no code which means you can
9:23
understand what's happening especially
9:25
in your backend workflows a lot easier
9:27
than with a tool like lovable and
9:29
superbase. And the benefit of this is
9:31
companies have really specific
9:32
processes. is that when a certain user
9:34
clicks this button, they want to send
9:35
data to three different separate third
9:37
party tools and then post data into
9:40
their database and then upsert that into
9:41
a vector database and all sorts of
9:43
technical things. And so you really have
9:45
to understand a business's processes and
9:47
be really specific in those backend
9:48
workflows. And that takes a deep
9:50
understanding of processes and it's
9:52
going to be something that's hard to
9:53
communicate to an AI tool like lovable
9:55
bolt and cursor at least at this stage.
9:57
So I think there's still the advantage
9:58
there. The other advantage is that these
10:00
tools handle all of the hosting server
10:03
management. It's one-click deployment.
10:05
And so for an internal company that just
10:07
wants a simple internal tool that's
10:09
going to sit there, it's going to do
10:10
their processes and they want to have as
10:12
little maintenance as possible. I think
10:13
you're still going to have some benefits
10:15
in this area for that industry. And the
10:17
other thing is is a single source of
10:18
truth. So you've got your database, your
10:20
front end, your back end, and even your
10:21
mobile application all sitting in one
10:23
place. It's simple to manage. It's easy.
10:26
It's visual to see. And that's what a
10:28
lot of internal companies are looking
10:30
for. They want simple, easy to manage,
10:32
but still do all of the processes and
10:34
handle all the complexity that is in
10:35
their business. And so for these
10:37
companies, vendor lockin is not as big
10:39
of an issue because they're not
10:40
predicted to have the scale to millions
10:43
of users that typically SAS and
10:46
two-sided marketplaces have to worry
10:47
about if they can get off the ground.
10:49
They just want something that's simple,
10:50
easy to manage, and does what their
10:52
business needs. And so I think tools
10:54
like bubble and no code are still going
10:56
to be pretty strong in that space for
10:57
the foreseeable future. Now that being
11:00
said, what I think could be a really
11:02
powerful benefit in the future and if
11:04
you are looking to get into this space,
11:06
learn some low code tools, learn some ad
11:08
tools and start to sell solutions, a
11:10
stack like this, I think is going to be
11:12
really really powerful in the next few
11:14
months and years. Now what have I got
11:16
here? Where I think these tools like
11:17
Lovable and Cursor are still lacking at
11:20
this current point in time is having a
11:22
really nice and easy to see back-end
11:24
workflow builder that tools like Bubble,
11:27
Make.com, Zapia, and N8N have. So, what
11:30
I think is a really powerful stack is
11:32
using a tool like Lovable for your front
11:34
end to be able to build really modern
11:36
looking user interfaces for all your
11:38
different screen sizes rapidly. Now,
11:39
Lovable is a great solution for your
11:41
front end. Superbase is a great solution
11:43
for your database. It's very scalable.
11:45
It handles authentication. It handles
11:47
whatever you need to handle. It's fairly
11:50
userfriendly and it's easy to use. But
11:52
setting up edge functions and stuff like
11:54
that. You're dealing with code and there
11:55
is a bit of a learning curve there. And
11:57
we've got these tools that have come out
11:58
now like tools like NAN which are
12:00
essentially where you can build backend
12:02
operations to process data. You can
12:04
self-host these solutions and they're
12:06
really powerful for building AI agents
12:08
and integrating AI into your back end.
12:10
So if you were to use some sort of
12:12
backend like NAD, call it via API
12:15
through your tool like Lovable and post
12:18
the data from NAN into a database that's
12:20
in Superbase. I think that's a really
12:22
scalable tech stack. It's fairly no
12:25
code, so it's fairly easy to understand
12:27
and it's really optimized for AI and AI
12:30
development. So something like this I
12:32
think is a really solid tech stack and
12:34
it's something that our business will
12:36
look to shift to if we start to build
12:38
more SAS and two-sided marketplaces in
12:41
the next few months. We're fully aware
12:43
that this is the direction that tech is
12:45
heading. But whether or not now is the
12:47
right time to jump into this, I still
12:49
think there's a couple of months left
12:52
where I'm just waiting for the LLMs to
12:53
get a little bit more accurate, waiting
12:55
for some of these tools to fix a few of
12:57
the little nuances that are currently
12:59
still in them. So, we're still building
13:00
a lot of these solutions with Bubble,
13:02
but we're looking to niche down into
13:03
building internal tools with Bubble cuz
13:05
I think it's still a great place for
13:07
companies to build simple internal
13:09
tools. But SAS and two-sided
13:11
marketplaces and even to internal tools
13:13
in the future, I think a tech stack like
13:15
this is the future of where software
13:17
development is headed and how you can
13:19
build rapid MVPs in one or two weeks.
13:21
So, this is a really, really solid tech
13:23
stack. In saying that, I'd love to hear
13:25
your opinion on where you think the
13:27
future of tech is going for building
13:29
apps for companies from 1 to 100
13:32
employees and rapid growing startups and
13:34
what your opinion on a really solid tech
13:36
stack for building these MVPs on
13:39
scalable infrastructure in just a couple
13:41
of days or weeks. Feel free to let me
13:42
know in the comments what your opinions
13:44
are. If you're interested in staying up
13:45
to date in everything low code and AI,
13:47
feel free to join my completely free
13:49
community in the link in the
13:51
description. We have weekly discussions
13:52
where we talk about all things AI and
13:54
low code. And yeah, I hope you found
13:55
this useful. Let me know in the comments
13:57
your thoughts on the directions that
13:58
this tech is going.