Anton Osika, Co-Founder and CEO @ Lovable: Hitting 85% Day 30 Retention - Better than ChatGPT

Description

Anton Osika is the Co-Founder and CEO @ Lovable, the fastest growing startup in Europe. With Lovable, you can turn your idea into an app in seconds with just a prompt. After just 3 months, the company has scaled to $17.5M in ARR. They are adding $2M in net new revenue every single week. Even better, Lovable has 85% Day 30 retention rate, making it more retentive than ChatGPT.
----------------------------------------------

In Today’s Episode We Discuss:

(00:00) Intro
(00:48) How a Side Project Turned into a $200M Company
(02:04) Why Talent is 10x More Valuable Than Experience
(05:24) How to Use a Waitlist Pre-Launch to 10x Growth
(09:32) How to Master a Public Launch: $0 - $1M ARR in a Week
(15:35) Why Raise a Large Seed Round
(20:42) How Sustainable is Lovable and AI Revenue
(23:41) What are Lovable’s Biggest Threats: Incumbents or Open Source
(26:15) Raising Series A: Should You Always Take the Money
(26:49) How to Compete in the US from Europe
(27:53) Is Europe as F as the World Thinks
(30:40) Building in Europe vs. Silicon Valley
(33:17) The Future of Foundation Models: Who Wins
(36:33) Grok vs OpenAI vs Anthropic: Buy and Short
(43:46) Quick-Fire Round
-----------------------------------------------

Subscribe on Spotify:
https://open.spotify.com/show/3j2KMcZTtgTNBKwtZBMHvl?si=85bc9196860e4466

Subscribe on Apple Podcasts:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-twenty-minute-vc-20vc-venture-capital-startup/id958230465

Follow Harry Stebbings on X:
https://twitter.com/HarryStebbings

Follow Anton Osika on X:
https://twitter.com/antonosika

Follow 20VC on Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/20vchq

Follow 20VC on TikTok:
https://www.tiktok.com/@20vc_tok

Visit our Website:
https://www.20vc.com

Subscribe to our Newsletter:
https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/contact
-----------------------------------------------

#20vc #harrystebbings #antonosika #lovable #ceo #founder #openai #grok #siliconvalley #europe #startups

Summary

Anton Osika, Co-Founder and CEO @ Lovable: Building Europe's Fastest Growing Startup with 85% Retention

In this insightful interview, Anton Osika, Co-Founder and CEO of Lovable, shares the remarkable journey of building Europe's fastest growing startup. Lovable allows users to turn ideas into fully functional apps through AI prompts, achieving an impressive 85% Day 30 retention rate—better than ChatGPT.

Anton discusses how Lovable evolved from GPT Engineer, an open-source side project he created during a weekend coding session. After seeing tremendous community interest, he partnered with a co-founder and transformed it into a commercial product. Since launching in November 2023 (just four months before this interview), Lovable has scaled to $17.5M in ARR and is adding an astonishing $2M in new revenue weekly.

The conversation explores Anton's leadership philosophy, emphasizing talent over experience. He believes in hiring ambitious people with high potential rather than focusing solely on previous experience. Anton shares lessons from his previous startup, Depict, particularly the importance of saying "no" to distractions and maintaining focus on core product features.

Anton provides valuable insights into Lovable's growth strategy, including their effective use of waitlists pre-launch and their approach to fundraising. Despite having incredible organic growth, they raised a seed round and later a Series A with Creandum to accelerate their trajectory. Anton explains that while bootstrapping was possible given their revenue, strategic investors provide value beyond capital.

The interview delves into AI industry dynamics, with Anton sharing his perspective on foundation models, competition from tech giants, and the sustainability of AI revenue. He counters skepticism about AI businesses by highlighting Lovable's exceptional retention metrics and explains how they've built proprietary technology beyond just wrapping existing models.

Anton also discusses his commitment to building in Europe despite challenges, citing the availability of raw talent as a key advantage. He expresses optimism about Europe's startup ecosystem, noting that the underdog mentality drives innovation.

For founders, Anton offers practical advice on product development, team building, and maintaining momentum during hypergrowth. His vision for Lovable is to become the platform of choice for a million talented builders, creating a foundation for expansion into enterprise markets and beyond.

Transcript

0:00 we have month one retention that's 0:01 better than chat gpt's month one 0:03 retention Anton Osa he is the co-founder 0:06 of lovable. Dev fastest growing company 0:08 in Europe what a title growth starts 0:11 ramping up after we launch growing 1 0:12 million AR per week at some point and 0:14 that just keeps accelerating the most 0:16 important thing is talent and culture 0:19 and there's more raw available talent in 0:22 Europe when a competitor has a lot of 0:24 money do you have to raise too ready to 0:27 go 0:28 [Music] 0:39 Anton fastest growing company in Europe 0:41 what a title but first thank you so much 0:43 for joining me today man thank you Harry 0:45 it's it's always fun to talk to you that 0:48 is very very kind of you it's the 0:49 British accent but I want to start 0:51 actually pre- lovable and I spoke to a 0:53 couple of your investors in your first 0:55 company depict and so I just want to 0:58 start there what are your big takeaways 1:01 from depict that shaped how you think 1:03 about lovable we scaled super super fast 1:07 at depict as well and and we like moving 1:10 just very fast Scrappy we did that we 1:13 nailed that really well I think we did 1:15 really well on this high potential 1:18 Talent as well quite Junior with high 1:20 potential Talent you can see that from 1:22 all the uh companies coming out from the 1:24 picted the the pict Mafia is is 1:27 absolutely real um but what I think we 1:30 what works in the beginning is to say 1:32 yes onto a lot of opportunities and try 1:34 out what works once you be become more 1:36 people and you have to follow up and 1:39 maintain everything that you start you 1:41 you have to be much more focused so we 1:44 said yes to too many things at at the 1:46 pick and uh we didn't like take this one 1:49 thing that we could do 10 times better 1:51 than anyone else uh and then at as the 1:55 economics uh macro wise turned worse we 2:00 we didn't continue the scaling 2:02 trajectory that we were on initially I 2:04 was just reading an article actually 2:05 with Paul book heite the founder of 2:07 Gmail and he said you need three great 2:10 features in a product and it's really 2:12 that simple and make them really really 2:15 great do you agree with that product 2:17 Simplicity towards feature depth yeah I 2:21 I think just on a produ product level 2:23 you should say no to as many things as 2:25 possible and make it more of like an 2:28 apple feeling the things you do you do 2:30 them the purpose okay and so we have hey 2:33 don't say uh yes to everything is there 2:36 anything else which you did or didn't do 2:38 that really shaped how you think about 2:40 the early days of lovable no I think 2:43 moving fast um and I I would say Talent 2:48 is the most important thing and culture 2:50 how you work together every day like how 2:52 people interact and collaborate quickly 2:55 uh those are the two most important 2:56 thing for for almost any company okay 2:59 let's just unpack talent because it's 3:01 been a I spoke to Frederick at creandum 3:03 before this and he said we had to chat 3:05 about this too you favor Talent overe 3:08 experience which sounds kind of obvious 3:11 respectfully you're going to go for like 3:13 an like an experienced untalented 3:16 person but how how do you think about 3:18 your hiring lessons around experience 3:21 versus Talent um so I think experience 3:24 can be a negative thing in some cases 3:27 you often want people who are super 3:29 ambitious they have a lot to prove and 3:32 they are more open-minded towards how 3:35 how you should work together in a team H 3:37 so um I mean for many RS I I think uh 3:41 junior Talent is is first of all super 3:43 easy to to get them into the company 3:45 they don't they're not uh already 3:48 committed to some like many their 3:50 projects the best people that you can 3:52 hire at a young age they would go on and 3:54 become Founders and then you can't hire 3:55 them anymore right so so that's why 3:58 junior uh people are often quite good 4:01 will you hire them if they haven't done 4:03 what you're hiring them to do before the 4:05 benefits often of hiring someone 4:07 experiences well I can see they've been 4:08 at X company for four years they can do 4:11 that at my company will you hire someone 4:13 who hasn't done what you asking them to 4:14 do before in most cases yes uh but I 4:18 mean if it's engineering you have to 4:20 know software engineering of course um 4:23 and you for some roles you definitely 4:27 want in that domain someone with a lot 4:30 of experience like that who can coach 4:33 and who can uh tell the more Junior 4:35 people what Great Looks Like These are 4:37 going to sound like strange questions 4:38 but you mentioned the word ambition 4:40 there did you always know that you would 4:42 be successful when you were younger 4:44 building did you always think I will be 4:47 successful in something that I do I no I 4:50 don't think so I I I I was always 4:52 frustrated with how people around me 4:54 didn't understand things as quickly as 4:57 me it felt like and then after at some 4:59 point I felt like well sometimes it's me 5:02 um being too naive I like that's 5:05 something I learned over time but uh 5:07 many of the like truths about what's 5:09 going to happen in the future have I 5:11 have a very good track track record on 5:13 and I think that's my this one of the 5:15 superpowers that have made me have made 5:17 me successful so I I felt I had that 5:19 superpower I didn't know it would 5:20 translate into building something 5:22 successfully how did you first make 5:25 money what was your first 5:26 entrepreneurial thing Anton ooh I think 5:30 so I always uh nerded out with kind of 5:34 computers and setting up our um like 5:38 land parties when I was a kid and so on 5:40 and so I noticed that all neighbors and 5:45 like friends or families they had the 5:46 comp computers and they had some issue 5:48 and then they called they wanted my help 5:51 and many of them wanted to pay me 5:52 afterwards so that became a bit of a 5:54 side hustle when I was I was a young 5:56 teenager did you do gaming when you were 5:58 younger yeah 6:01 yeah you're like the I'm so sorry to be 6:03 rude but you're like the easiest like 6:05 archetype because you fit like all the 6:08 characteristics of like successful 6:09 Founders that I have on the show it's 6:11 like number one made money early number 6:13 two exceling gaming uh both very very 6:16 clear um archetypes I want to move to 6:19 lovable so GPT engineer starts as a side 6:23 project where does the idea come from 6:26 we've left to pick G uh gbt engineer 6:28 starts as a side project where does the 6:30 idea come from um this was the spring 6:32 after chat GPT came out and I've been 6:35 playing with the the precursors of that 6:37 as well and I from already like a year 6:40 before then I felt there's an there's a 6:42 massive wave coming from scaling up 6:44 these models with more data and the p is 6:47 not set up for for currently not set up 6:49 for leveraging that after like I was 6:53 actually traveling with my now wife as 6:57 her engagement trip and when you're 6:59 traveling I get extra creative and there 7:03 um I don't think there was anyone who 7:05 was talking about like AI agents at the 7:07 time but I uh during those like sitting 7:10 on an airplane I was I started writing a 7:12 lot of like okay you can you should 7:14 hook them up and make uh you basically 7:17 put the large language model in a for 7:19 Loop and then you can have it to do a 7:21 lot of agentic things and then uh when 7:24 I'm back in Sweden I'm like okay where 7:27 do I apply this obviously on software 7:30 engineering and I'd been talking to 7:33 people about this and I felt no one was 7:34 really sufficiently imaginative to what 7:38 I was thinking about and I had to like 7:40 prove a point in that this is already 7:42 now with the current first versions of 7:44 chbt apis you can build an agent that 7:47 writes code and then I put together that 7:50 there were two I drank a lot of coffee 7:51 and then I just crammed away and um I 7:55 got the first version that really 7:57 impressed people you write create a 7:58 snake game and then you get a running 8:00 snake game on your computer yeah so that 8:03 that was the the first version of what 8:05 what we're building now how long did it 8:07 take you to build V1 with that 8:08 caffeinated session I think it was um 8:13 like one main weekend and then a bit of 8:15 Polish over with a few hours here and 8:17 there on two two weekends after that 8:20 what are the biggest lessons or advice 8:22 from building many different v1s for 8:24 many Founders that are listening it 8:26 depends what you're building for 8:30 um for most like firsttime Founders I 8:34 would really focus on the user and the 8:38 user problem and say like how can I get 8:41 one person to love what I'm building in 8:44 in this V1 uh that that's my general 8:46 advice I didn't do that I just put out a 8:48 video on Twitter and it got dozens of 8:50 academic references and millions of 8:53 people using it so take me to that so we 8:56 have this weekend we released the 8:58 product what happens then dude yeah so 9:01 it wasn't clear to me that I would build 9:03 a business on this at all I thought it 9:04 was fun that there was like and this was 9:06 an open source project so I I started 9:08 nourishing like a community that went on 9:10 to work on this open source project 9:13 while I I talk went to my co-founder and 9:16 said like Okay so this thing is 9:17 absolutely huge um I've been thinking of 9:20 doing something else to be honest and 9:22 they here is like pretty like this is a 9:23 bit of a wake up call for me that it's 9:25 it might be time to find a good 9:26 replacement for me as a CTO at at picked 9:30 that's what happened next and then then 9:31 a few months passed and so a few months 9:33 pass the community continues to grow 9:36 what happens then no but I I I figure 9:38 out a good replacement for me I decide I 9:41 need I want to have a great co-founder 9:43 that I can have as like my partnering 9:45 crime here and and there was a guy who 9:47 is the most super efficient zero fluff 9:52 and and engineer and 9:54 entrepreneur so he had sold a company 9:56 previously that I wanted to work with 9:57 and I I I biked to apartment and said 10:00 hey let's take a walk and uh plan the 10:02 future so he I got him him on board and 10:05 then we started building and created the 10:08 first version of what became loveable 10:10 lovable okay so we're building the first 10:13 version of lovable you've got your 10:14 co-founder talk to me about that time 10:17 when did we release and how did the 10:19 official release go with lovable as a 10:21 product in company so the the launch of 10:24 lovable like the product was one year 10:26 after we started building and um in the 10:28 meantime time we launched like great 10:31 listed preview versions called GPT 10:33 engineer app that was I mean that that's 10:36 the getting user feedback cycle and um 10:41 building building up I guess some some 10:43 excitement about what we were work 10:44 working on and employer branding as well 10:47 and the the first versions I I think 10:49 they were very good as they were good 10:51 they were not very good and we had some 10:53 people really liking it but the like the 10:57 Thea moments didn't click for 11:00 sufficiently many people like okay this 11:02 is how I get real value from this when 11:04 we when we went on to iterate over the 11:06 coming year we packaged together all of 11:09 these things so that you can ask today 11:13 lovable I want to build the basically a 11:15 SAS business and then people have built 11:19 their entire SAS companies and get made 11:20 made money by just prompting our AI I 11:24 just want I just want to break down a 11:25 couple of different things that you said 11:26 there you mentioned the weight list do 11:28 you have any big lessons or advice on 11:30 how to do a weight list strategy well I 11:33 think the weight lists are useful in 11:35 that you can control exactly how many 11:38 people you want to get on board and take 11:40 user interview interviews with with so I 11:42 think that's the like just get 11:43 sufficiently many people on the weight 11:45 list find a good way to qualify who you 11:48 want to talk to like you have you 11:50 probably have a different hypothesis on 11:51 who should get who you should talk to 11:53 who you're going to sell into who you're 11:55 who has the most value from your product 11:57 and then uh qualify only those and talk 11:59 to them when you do the user interviews 12:01 and user feedback sessions what are your 12:04 big lessons or piece of advice on how to 12:06 do them well what questions are good 12:07 what questions are bad any lessons uh so 12:11 there there I think for us there are two 12:13 different type of user to use we we had 12:15 this this type where we just see them 12:17 use the product and see like where do 12:19 they do they understand the product and 12:20 so that's more of a you user experience 12:22 interiew um and the other one is uh to 12:26 understand like if they have just tried 12:28 the product a bit we ask them okay so 12:30 you tried the product a bit what's why 12:33 are you even interested in this and ask 12:34 them like what problems they're facing 12:37 in their business try to identify what's 12:40 the biggest pain point that you that 12:43 they're actually looking to solve it 12:44 might be oh I want to get more customers 12:46 and I think I can get more customers if 12:49 I can show to my customers that I can 12:51 get the first version out with AI more 12:53 more quickly H so those those type of 12:56 questions how does it change the 12:58 structure of teams when you look at 13:00 teams today you have obviously software 13:02 Engineers you have designers you have 13:04 developers you have front end you have 13:06 backend how does it change the structure 13:09 of teams themselves Harry if you want to 13:11 create a personal website for you it's 13:14 super productive you can do it you don't 13:16 have a team it's just you you just 13:17 create it with AI if you want to ship 13:21 the first version of yourselves and 13:22 start making money it's all you it's not 13:24 a team like a team just slows you down 13:25 maybe you get some input from a designer 13:27 like he how does this how do you think 13:28 it's just look and and so on uh but once 13:31 you have existing 13:33 software with users and then you want to 13:37 iterate and change that software 13:39 AI 13:41 might absolutely bring 13:44 down kind of mess up your entire 13:46 codebase I might mess up your code base 13:49 so then you would want to work with a 13:51 software engineer that knows how to 13:54 bring have quality and consistently keep 13:58 quality in the product you mentioned 14:00 like people took a bit of time to find 14:02 that aha moment how important is the 14:04 time to aha moment I think it's very 14:07 important and it's funny because you 14:09 asked me this question and I I think we 14:11 are very bad at making the time to a 14:15 moment super short I think we could like 14:17 double our conversion rates if we become 14:19 better at uh like speed to a h moment 14:24 but you I can say something we're doing 14:26 let me take credit for something when 14:28 you come to love 14:29 you just see a prompt box it's very 14:32 inviting instead of getting to a landing 14:33 page you you see a prompt box and then 14:35 for the ones that do enter a prompt box 14:39 you get a quite a quick a of the first 14:42 aham and there has to be many aha 14:45 moments in lovable it's quite a complex 14:48 a software engineer is a very complex 14:49 feature but uh that that we are doing 14:51 well and that's what I I would recommend 14:54 just give the user something interactive 14:56 with instant reward you mentioned that 14:58 the prompt box itself I've had many 15:00 guests on the show say before that 15:01 almost the biggest sin that chat GPT did 15:05 was make chat the default UI for a 15:08 future of AI do you think that bluntly 15:11 chat and the prompting that we have 15:13 today in in lovable and many other 15:15 products is the right default UI for an 15:18 age of AI I think yes prompting can you 15:22 can do almost anything with prompting 15:24 and explaining your thoughts in in 15:25 written form it's um er it's also easy 15:29 to implement an itate on but but it's 15:31 going to get more advanced over time 15:33 with not just prompting I love the way 15:35 you took a deep breath there it's like 15:38 this is a weighty 15:39 question I'm thinking about it a lot I 15:41 mean you're building the interface for 15:43 creating software and no one knows what 15:45 that interface is going to look like but 15:48 the prompt thing yes I think it remains 15:51 but I'm kind of going chronologically 15:53 through the story because it's an 15:54 amazing story um you rejected YC at some 15:59 point yeah talk to me why did you reject 16:03 YC we felt that at uh best YC would be a 16:09 lot of dilution and some acceleration 16:12 but a lot of dilution and some 16:13 acceleration and at worst it would be a 16:15 distraction H to go to SF and go through 16:19 all of these like fun things that happen 16:21 when you go to YC um and we we just took 16:24 some funding instead and uh built focus 16:28 on Talent the seed round when does the 16:30 seed round come does that come post 16:33 launch or pre-launch so that comes 16:36 before we launch the first the first 16:40 waight list of our product even okay how 16:42 did that seed round go so before you've 16:44 launched the weight list of the product 16:46 how did that round go how did it come to 16:49 be yeah so I I I have this advice that 16:53 I've always gone by which is to work 16:55 with investors that you like and I I had 16:58 some people that I know from before that 17:00 I just think are amazing people that I 17:02 want to have by my side and if things go 17:05 sour if things go well uh and I spoke to 17:09 a few uh I kept it very very brief I got 17:11 like a preemptive offer and I said yeah 17:13 let's let's do it I love it how big was 17:15 this round so we took three million and 17:18 then we added on um I got the advice to 17:21 say like yeah just to get a lot of cash 17:23 because you never know what happens in 17:24 the markets so we we raised a quite a 17:27 large pre uh with an up to uh almost $8 17:31 million would you advise Founders to 17:33 raise quite large preed rounds if they 17:35 can if the money is on the table would 17:37 you say take it depends on how you want 17:39 to operate like if you like talking to 17:42 investors which at the time I was like 17:43 no I just want to build the technology 17:45 then then the answer sure take ra a big 17:48 pred so you can you get time to figure 17:51 things out um if 17:54 you like talking to investors which I um 17:58 I think you should 17:59 if you think it's an interesting to just 18:02 talk to a lot of interesting people who 18:04 care about understanding the market then 18:06 I would go more race more iteratively 18:09 smaller smaller runs we're seeing a lot 18:11 of Founders today be immensely dilution 18:15 sensitive from day one in a way that 18:17 they haven't been before like 10% is 18:19 like the max they're willing to give up 18:21 on a round how did you think about 18:23 dilution sensitivity uh here again like 18:26 I have a very wise person who was like 18:28 no dilution does does matter so much 18:29 it's all about the size of the pie and 18:33 I I think that was I was both affected 18:37 by that advice as so as my like no 18:40 minimized ution this is this is my life 18:42 life's work so that's mainly how I think 18:45 about it now so we now raise this round 18:47 we have the wait list we're skipping a 18:48 little bit take me to go live day when 18:52 when does that happen and how does go 18:54 live go we go live with lavall the 21st 18:58 of November last year 21st of November 19:01 last year that was only four months 19:03 ago yes four months ago isn't it nuts 19:06 how much like life changes in four 19:08 months it's true it can change really 19:10 fast yes yeah so November 19:13 2024 you launch from day one is it just 19:17 nuts How does it go um so I mean we had 19:20 users paying users on like earli version 19:24 that was called something else um and 19:27 then our launch 19:29 I think it wasn't one of these like wow 19:31 launches I I think we could have gotten 19:36 like 10 times more press on the launch 19:38 100% um but people start noticing like w 19:41 this is really good and and we continue 19:43 to quickly improve things in the 19:45 products chip things very rapidly um so 19:48 it ramps like growth starts ramping up 19:50 after we launch and we we like wow we're 19:53 growing 1 million AR per week at some 19:55 point and and that just keeps going 19:57 accelerating through that was in 19:59 December and that it just keeps ACC 20:01 accelerating 20:03 we it was a bit on the technical side it 20:05 was a bit frustrating because we have we 20:08 have some a lot of scaling issues that 20:11 we run into and the team is like okay we 20:13 can continue to uh patch this but they 20:17 say like we let's rewrite everything 20:20 while we're seeing this explosive growth 20:22 and there's so 20:23 many quick fixes that we want to do on 20:26 the product side so you roted ASAP and 20:28 stabilized it then yeah so it took a bit 20:32 more than eight weeks I mean it's not 20:34 completely done to date but that we took 20:38 eight weeks and then now we're shipping 20:41 faster can I ask you you mentioned that 20:43 like a millionaire r a week how much are 20:46 you growing now a week two million year 20:49 per week two million a week now 20:57 yeah like 20:59 it's so funny for me dude CU like when 21:01 you live in a world Adventure you don't 21:03 you don't kind of get this I don't think 21:04 and I don't mean that rudely to you but 21:06 like your companies go from like one to 21:09 four in a year and that's like a 21:13 four a in a year amazing that would be 21:16 good and then you're like growing 2 21:18 million a in a week does that sink in 21:20 like do you know how nuts that is no I 21:23 guess no I I mean um I a lot of things 21:27 last few weeks have just blunted me and 21:29 I'm just I'm just focused on all the 21:31 things that we have to fix and like 21:33 improve and that's all I think about 21:34 what do you think are the most common 21:36 ways or methods that company's 21:39 development process slows down for 21:42 Founders listening what should they 21:43 watch out for that often happens what 21:47 makes product development slower is 21:49 usually that you have a complex product 21:51 and you have a lot of requirements on 21:54 your product so you you said earlier har 21:57 that you have three three things that 21:59 are good in your product I think that's 22:01 uh generally A very wise thing to do 22:04 Simplicity leads to product Direction 22:06 knowing where you're going and what 22:08 you're working on when you look back 22:10 since the start of lovable where from a 22:13 product perspective did you invest and 22:15 spend time where was the benefit of 22:18 hindsight you shouldn't have done I 22:21 think at Lev ball we we thought a lot 22:23 about the community and like Community 22:25 features inside of the product and the 22:29 that I think that could have made a lot 22:31 of sense if we had seen slower growth 22:34 but now that you just like growth is not 22:37 something we not a concern you don't 22:38 need Community features to power growth 22:41 so that I think that was pretty much 22:43 waste waste of effort do you agree with 22:45 the sentiment build it and they will 22:47 come the growth has been amazing from 22:50 day one it feels like since gbt engineer 22:52 even people have just kind of come for 22:54 the product because it's been amazing 22:56 and different do you believe and they 22:58 will come actually does stand true today 23:01 if you have a very strong vision of 23:05 how that where there is untapped 23:07 potential if you really know that deep 23:09 down and you have track record of 23:12 showing that then build it and they will 23:14 come is going to work um uh and and you 23:18 also have the runway your personal like 23:21 energy Runway and so on to really make 23:24 it work and they make them come but for 23:28 in most most cases yeah that is too 23:30 risky it's too risky to just build it 23:32 and they will come and it's you can 23:34 build it and make them come or try to 23:37 make them come at the same time and 23:38 that's much lower lower risk you said 23:41 there about energy and it reminded me of 23:43 a statement that Nick revolute said to 23:46 me in a show when he was talking about 23:47 his investing and he said the most 23:49 successful Founders that he invests in 23:51 are between 30 and 35 they don't have 23:55 the naivity of the incredibly young 23:57 founders but they don't have the bluntly 24:00 tiredness in some ways or that you know 24:03 you have more energy when you're younger 24:05 of older Founders how do you think about 24:08 that given your age today I think energy 24:11 is uh super important and uh I think the 24:15 navity is is a benefit often but uh I 24:20 mean I I I made mistake a lot of 24:23 mistakes was the first time manager as 24:25 well that uh dep picked pretty much what 24:27 was the biggest mistake he made thinking 24:30 that we should change the culture and 24:31 become a more of a scale up something 24:34 slow moving or like more management 24:36 layers when we became 40 people that's 24:39 that was the biggest mistake I did why 24:41 did you think 24:42 that that was I mean my 24:46 co-founder 24:47 um and other senior people we spoke to 24:50 said like oh now you have to hire 24:52 Executives and so on and that uh was um 24:57 that was a bad idea that okay and so did 24:59 you start hiring Executives pretty much 25:01 yeah or yeah we did and then they don't 25:05 work uh one person I hired didn't work 25:08 out uh which slowed me down and they 25:11 kind of set us back a lot and so when 25:12 you think about that what would your 25:14 advice be to other Founders don't 25:16 believe the you can scale way 25:18 longer without exag many Founders hire 25:22 more mercenary style maybe like skilled 25:25 people but just like they are running in 25:27 their Lane 25:29 um I hire generalists and I like try to 25:32 empower them as much as possible and if 25:35 you have a lot of General super super 25:36 smart generalist that you're um doing a 25:40 lot of smart like new initiatives and so 25:42 on adding Executives on top of them um 25:47 is high risk and like reward is 25:52 questionable it's at some point of 25:54 course it makes sense does culture break 25:56 at any point when you're scaling user 25:59 base so fast you're scaling Revenue so 26:01 fast I mean usually I think it does yes 26:04 or it changes it changes it evolves um 26:07 for this is something I'm very mindful 26:10 about and I why I'm so scared of adding 26:13 too many heads what are you worried 26:15 about the most important thing for 26:19 everyone at our company I which I talk 26:21 about is uh to role model how much you 26:25 care about the product the users the 26:28 entire the team how how well the team 26:30 works and role model and Mak sure other 26:33 people care it as much as you and feel 26:36 that that comes from a feeling of of 26:38 ownership of the culture and the team if 26:40 you're a lot of people that gets diluted 26:43 typically 26:44 so um yeah that that's that's what 26:47 breaks or that's what's harder okay so 26:50 we have the team scaling we have user 26:52 base we have Revenue 26:54 scaling we're making actually a lot of 26:56 money at this point why a series a I 26:59 just had some scheduled checkins with 27:02 investors and there was this one guy and 27:07 his team that had like obsessed about 27:10 lavable for the last few months and they 27:13 they're hearing fedck he's here in 27:15 Stockholm at kandum and uh he G he just 27:19 gives gives an amazing impression on me 27:22 and I'm like okay I could I can wait 27:25 because I know it's very clear to me 27:27 that this is just the beginning and I 27:28 can I can could raise it later but we 27:32 can accelerate by adding an investor 27:35 that is a partner in on in helping to 27:39 find more amazing people in um just as a 27:43 sounding board Fredick helped grow 27:45 Spotify from from nothing um and uh I we 27:51 decided to raise a small round okay so 27:53 you decided to raise a small run I have 27:54 to ask this you have many well-funded 27:56 competitors in the US I think it was 27:59 Neil Murray that said you put like we're 28:02 Devon that actually works from like very 28:04 early on yeah which I thought was bold 28:08 um when a competitor has a lot of money 28:11 do you have to raise too I don't think 28:13 so no I mean you can just we could 28:15 bootstrap like you don't you can 28:17 bootstrap most things so you never have 28:20 to raise but they can outs spend you on 28:23 Talent on customers on marketing no yeah 28:27 I mean if you're 28:29 I I'm not afraid of any of those if 28:31 being out spend on any of those I think 28:34 it's the only thing that matters is 28:36 execution so if you can outperform your 28:39 own execution then I'm scared where 28:41 could you improve your execution today 28:43 we spoke about speed of shipping amazing 28:46 culture's great the talent's phenomenal 28:49 where would you say execution wise you 28:51 could 28:52 improve I think you can always improve 28:55 on like how the decision Loop on how 28:58 fast you take decisions and communicate 29:01 those decisions so that everyone is 29:03 really on the same page that's uh how 29:05 how you do that how do you make them 29:07 today how could it be improved I think 29:10 it's about doing fewer I think we could 29:12 do fewer things as well at lovable like 29:15 there's a lot of uh people with great 29:18 ideas that each each idea in isation is 29:20 great but you can only have so many you 29:22 should only execute on so many at the 29:24 same time we mentioned the team and the 29:26 culture one and we mentioned there 29:28 you've been pretty Ardent around 29:30 building in Europe keeping the team in 29:31 Europe being a European company a lot of 29:35 people say to me by staying in Europe 29:38 you are deliberately not doing what is 29:40 best for your career if you were in the 29:42 valley you would be more successful what 29:45 is your response to them the most 29:47 important thing is talent and culture 29:50 and it's more raw there's more raw 29:55 available talent in Europe uh the 29:58 culture isn't on the like the US has 30:01 more culture that fits succeeding as a 30:04 startup I have to say per default so 30:08 what what specifically do you think it 30:09 is about that culture so it's about then 30:12 theault of thinking big and being super 30:15 ambitious and being very committed to 30:18 making things work that that in Europe 30:21 people are more like about uh living a 30:24 balanced uh life and uh we're we're kind 30:29 of taught that we 30:31 should um in in Sweden we we talk 30:35 about the law of jante which is that you 30:38 should be better than others okay yes 30:42 this so This concerns me so how do you 30:44 respond to people who say you would be 30:46 more successful if you were in the 30:47 valley we would be S so if you're a 30:49 Founder I think you you 30:53 have more free entropy of like talents 30:58 to use and channel into some into 31:00 something successful but there are of 31:01 course many benefits from being in the 31:03 valley I think it's a bit of playing on 31:05 the on hard mode here from Europe and I 31:08 get excited about playing on hard mode 31:10 and showing that you can create a 31:12 category defining company uh which is 31:15 lovable in our case from Europe are you 31:18 positive about Europe moving forwards we 31:20 are in a doom loop around Europe which 31:22 we both disagree with and hate are you 31:24 positive and what guides your thinking 31:27 yeah I'm uh I'm super positive I think 31:29 there is a like an strong Underdog 31:31 mentality among all of us Founders now 31:34 which is usually a a winning concept to 31:37 be to feel like the underdog and having 31:39 wanting to prove others wrong I also 31:41 think there's incredible superpowers in 31:43 using the Arbitrage pricing of 31:45 incredible engineers in Europe and 31:47 selling into the US you can build huge 31:51 companies selling into the US from 31:53 Europe doesn't mean you can't sell into 31:55 the US just because you're a European 31:56 company true no it's a very Global 31:59 Market dude um I've got some questions 32:02 which are a little bit spicier but I 32:04 have to ask them okay so a spicier one 32:08 is if one were to criticize lovable they 32:11 would say amazing God look at the 32:14 revenue growth look at the user growth 32:16 but is this like AI um Sugar Sugar 32:19 Revenue in other words it's not 32:21 sustainable and it will churn very 32:23 quickly how do you respond to it's not 32:27 really real stainable revenue and it's 32:29 not sticky we have month one retention 32:33 that's better than chat gpt's month one 32:35 retention on paying customers and so 32:38 it's about 32:40 85% and that um that is just going up 32:44 like they of course there's a lot of 32:46 things to be desired when you working 32:49 with an AI system there's a fraction of 32:51 people some people that come in and 32:53 they're they just like flip up their 32:55 credit card because they want to try 32:57 they they want to learn which is 32:59 rational thing to do and then they know 33:01 that they are going to stop using it 33:03 almost they almost know so we have a 33:05 fraction of users who are like those 33:07 people wow 85% month one yeah wow that's 33:14 great because you're also too early to 33:16 have month six what could you do today 33:19 to increase retention most significantly 33:22 the easiest thing we can do is to 33:26 give more more of the important aha 33:29 moments to ensure that every all of our 33:31 users get more of the important aha 33:33 moments on how to use the product I I I 33:35 don't I don't really respectfully agree 33:38 or get you because like you give prompts 33:41 Under The Prompt box so you say like 33:43 build me a sass app or build me a dog 33:45 website or whatever the prompt is dude 33:47 all you need to do is click it and you 33:49 see the code being written and then you 33:52 see it being created like the aha moment 33:55 is pretty obvious no so there are many 33:58 aha moments for or like education 34:01 moments to get the most value get the 34:04 full value out of using it and there the 34:06 most important of those are with regards 34:09 to when the when you feel like you're 34:10 getting stuck and the AI doesn't 34:12 understand you and there's a there are 34:15 many things in how to get around around 34:19 that that you can pick up as user it is 34:22 how you about how you prompt it's about 34:24 how to understand what doesn't work and 34:26 explain or explain clearly what what the 34:29 what the problems you're seeing what 34:31 what you find could be the problem when 34:33 you're building a more complex feature 34:36 and it's about that you can actually 34:37 onboard an engineer to do small changes 34:39 to the code base like those are things 34:42 our users should know and not everyone 34:44 knows them what's your norstar matric 34:46 today if you have one metric on the TV 34:48 for the whole team to focus on what is 34:51 it um it's the number of uh users that 34:57 go all the way to getting like users on 35:00 what they built getting getting 35:02 something hosted with users on what they 35:03 built that's what we focus on what's the 35:06 amount today so we have almost 40,000 35:10 paying users and then that's the proxy 35:12 for that wow 40,000 PES as okay do 35:17 you care about the time it takes to go 35:19 from start to website created or not we 35:22 care about I I have to say Harry like 35:25 the these things about the onboarding 35:27 and how much can improve um is not 35:29 something that I we have had focus on 35:34 like we were just making the core AI 35:36 Parts better better better that's what 35:37 we focus on okay so you say about making 35:40 the core AI Parts better better better 35:42 yeah amazing people also say ah rappers 35:46 on top of other people's models why are 35:49 they wrong with that assumption I mean 35:51 it's very easy to create a cool demo 35:53 with just a rapper it's super easy to 35:55 make a cool demo with just a rapper the 35:56 hard part is to get to or get close to 36:00 100% you get what you're asking for and 36:05 there's a lot of small 36:07 details in making that work there's a 36:09 lot of small details and there's a chain 36:11 of at large language model API calls and 36:13 other algorithms that run and that chain 36:16 is like you can continue to optimize 36:18 that for years without reaching 36:19 Perfection whose models do you sit on 36:22 top of today we we use all of open AI 36:25 models Google Gemini and the main 36:29 Workhorse is anthropics Claud model for 36:32 writing the code I was going to have 36:34 this in a quick F but I have to ask it 36:35 now you've got anthropic at 60 billion 36:40 you've got open AI at 300 or you've got 36:42 grock at 50 which do you buy and which 36:45 do you sell okay so um I 36:50 think I would I I care about the best 36:53 talent here and I feel like uh Elon is 36:57 very good at tent so I would buy I would 36:59 buy Gro I think they're also very 37:02 ruthless in like finding business 37:03 opportunities we we'll see about that 37:05 but I feel like they could be good at 37:07 that even though anthropic is my 37:08 favorite I love the the culture and I 37:10 love the like the leadership there um 37:13 and I will short open AI because they're 37:15 they're like have been very good in the 37:18 scrappy face but they they haven't 37:20 proven that they can um we have a clear 37:24 product Direction and focus now over the 37:27 last years 37:28 so I would push sorry I'm it's a Sunday 37:30 we're allowed to be a little bit more 37:32 casual I would push back on you and go 37:34 the two biggest things that matter in 37:35 this next wave is brand yeah recognition 37:38 on the consumer side and it's consumer 37:41 facing frontend products and when you 37:43 look at Brand everyone's mother knows 37:45 chat GPT they don't even know open AI 37:48 but they know chat GPT and then on the 37:50 consumer product side respectfully 37:52 they're way ahead of anyone 37:54 else that's true am I wrong I just I 37:57 just think we're still early in the days 38:00 of AI and if you look at the Enterprise 38:02 Revenue like anthropic is almost caught 38:05 up to open AI from nothing from being 38:09 absolutely dominated and I don't know 38:12 what Gro is going to do here but I 38:15 expect them to be having a like open a I 38:17 lost all their best talent to to 38:20 anthropic I think Gro might be able to 38:23 pull something off here I spoke to a 38:24 very wise friend of mine before this and 38:26 they said that the biggest conc that I 38:27 have is that open source or Mega corpse 38:31 of the world with massive distribution 38:33 advantages come in and win the market 38:36 how do you think about that and is that 38:38 a concern the big Mega Corps they move 38:41 very slowly in many domains so they're 38:44 never going to in many years they're not 38:46 going to have the best product on the 38:48 market there are distribution advantages 38:50 for some of this Mega Corps and that's 38:52 like the marketing and distribution is 38:54 is what I'm more concerned about um but 38:57 overall it's going to be like a growing 38:59 Market where you can easily as a startup 39:04 be both best position for some parts of 39:06 the market one thing that's going to be 39:08 a real shift I imagine that you have to 39:11 face is the shift from plg and kind of 39:14 prosumer to Enterprise how do you think 39:17 about that shift and is that just not a 39:19 concern given the speed of Revenue ramp 39:21 how do you think about that um yeah I 39:24 think if we would do Enterprise I would 39:26 want to do that really well so we're 39:27 holding off with doing Enterprise for 39:29 now we're holding off and U our goal you 39:33 may asked about the north Zone north 39:35 star metric what we want to have is we 39:38 want to be the best place for for 39:40 Builders to create products and get the 39:44 hund get get a million of the most 39:46 talented builders on lovable and if we 39:48 succeed in that that's a great segue 39:51 into many other areas including 39:53 Enterprise when you look at 39:55 Shopify what do you learn from them 39:58 blazing a trial in the way they have 40:00 done as efficiently as they have done i' 40:02 I'd I'd love to hear from you har what's 40:04 the what do what are you most impressed 40:07 by with Shopify honestly I would say 40:09 it's their narrative around everyone 40:12 being an entrepreneur I think Harley's a 40:14 phenomenal communicator and Storyteller 40:16 at bringing very real businesses to life 40:19 and how Shopify changed their processes 40:22 their sales and really made an impact 40:26 and I I love to and I think he's 40:28 obviously a brilliant technologist but I 40:30 think without Harley's storytelling 40:33 narrative entrepreneurial Vibes to life 40:38 it would be a different company so I 40:39 would learn from that a lot in terms of 40:41 how to tell your customers 40:43 stories yeah to not totally I I think 40:47 Shopify um has been able to execute on 40:50 many things and just created a good 40:53 package I they've iterated fast that's 40:55 my impression they've iterated fast on 40:57 serving all the needs for for building 40:59 your e-commerce and I think this 41:01 velocity is was one the most important 41:04 thing for building the best product when 41:05 we look forward dude what would you most 41:08 like to build in the product but for 41:11 whatever reason you cannot why what 41:13 would that reason be I think I can build 41:15 anything into the product really like 41:18 team would block you um that PRI 41:20 prioritization not the right time okay 41:23 so something that we have to say no to 41:25 right now yeah so I'd love to build in a 41:29 way for Founders to get everything you 41:33 get out the Y combinator into lavable so 41:36 that that includes like some marketing 41:38 infrastructure why comor has that uh all 41:41 the entire Playbook and going above that 41:44 and even saying like oh here's your 41:47 Incorporated Delaware C comp company 41:49 your stripe setup you just have to focus 41:52 on the product and talking to users and 41:54 creating content for marketing when you 41:56 look at partnership ships today apis 41:58 that we have today into the different 42:00 providers that's that's quite a real and 42:02 possible product yes yes it's a it's on 42:06 the road map wow yeah good okay well YC 42:11 are going to love you after this show 42:14 uh um final one when we look forward 42:18 dude what concerns you most if you had 42:20 to choose was it be regulatory 42:22 challenges competition or hype Cycles I 42:25 think if someone competitors is super 42:28 super good at marketing uh that would 42:30 concern me how important is 42:33 brand I think brand is mainly the 42:37 outcome of your product there's other 42:40 factors too and then so I mean product 42:45 is the important thing and then product 42:48 good product plus awareness just creates 42:49 brand that's that's I think was 42:51 sufficient so it's more of a downstream 42:54 effect of something else then it is 42:56 important when you're doing 2 million a 42:58 week in in additional ARA you're going 43:01 to have more and more investors want to 43:03 give you 43:04 money how do you think about that and 43:09 what what makes it worth it to take 43:12 versus this is a distraction get out of 43:14 my face it's currently it's a 43:16 distraction I think it might make it 43:20 worth it it will make it worth it when 43:22 we know know how to exactly how we want 43:23 to spend the money or it's a partner we 43:26 really want to work with and um it's 43:30 like terms where we we would never 43:33 regret saying yes to them what if done 43:36 would be a massive needle mover for the 43:38 company one or two more of the perfect 43:42 technical product 43:45 hires dude I could talk to you all day I 43:47 want to move into a quick fire around so 43:49 I say a short statement you give me your 43:50 thought so yeah what do you believe that 43:53 most around you disbelieve I think we 43:56 have models today that are really smart 43:58 I think that's where people don't agree 44:01 with me they're they're smarter than 44:03 humans but they don't have memory in the 44:05 same extent as we do they don't have 44:08 context how fast will we ramp context in 44:11 memory given scaling today it's the ramp 44:15 what you need to ramp is to decide what 44:19 like the the process for storing memory 44:22 I think is what you have to ramp and it 44:23 has to store all of these things like my 44:25 conversation with Harry has to be stored 44:27 somehow into the system and all like my 44:30 childhood almost has to be stored as 44:31 well I don't know it's going to take 44:33 years you can buy and hold one public 44:36 stock for the next 10 years which one do 44:38 you buy and hold um some Talent play 44:43 would and what comes to mind is Tesla 44:45 and they're also interestingly 44:47 positioned outside of uh software wow 44:50 okay what was the most important trait 44:52 in a Founder that no one talks about U 44:55 okay I think great judgment people 44:58 probably talk about but but I think um I 45:01 like people who hire like see potential 45:03 in people it's like okay this this 45:05 person can become amazing and and the 45:08 Judgment in picking Talent like that 45:09 what's your biggest weakness as CEO 45:11 today um I'm not as good as multitasking 45:15 as I would like to 45:17 be if lovable failed tomorrow what would 45:21 be the reason like investors WR a 45:23 premortem which is like a reason why 45:25 something doesn't work what is that um 45:28 we lose momentum and excitement and 45:32 that's like that's what fuels us today 45:35 right all the excitement and the 45:37 momentum what have you changed your mind 45:39 on in the last 12 months you don't need 45:42 to be attached to One Foundation model 45:44 provider they're all going to be amazing 45:46 you don't need to there's not going to 45:47 be one winner here are we seeing 45:49 Foundation models be completely 45:51 commoditized 45:53 yes we won't see specializations like we 45:56 do today I know Claude is better for 45:57 codee and 45:59 Engineering do you think that will 46:01 really uh equalize yeah I love the sweds 46:05 one word 46:07 answers um what's your favorite failure 46:11 um I I think so when I was 17 I failed 46:15 my exams at school Anton I failed them 46:18 badly yeah like D D's across the board 46:21 and I I looked at myself and I was like 46:23 I'm either going to work behind a bar or 46:26 I can make something of my life mhm and 46:29 I chose to work harder than ever and 46:31 make something of my life 46:33 um that is my favorite failure I think 46:37 my favorite 46:39 failure um I 46:42 probably that I didn't 46:45 um the pict didn't work out so I could 46:47 do more things what concerns you most in 46:49 the world today I think that leadership 46:53 in this in the world today I I love that 46:55 whole leadership to be true idealists 46:58 and not like function of circumstances 47:01 and the people to pleas um and be much 47:05 more open-minded to people who disagree 47:07 with them and super intelligent as well 47:11 but leadership in the world today uh are 47:14 usually like a bit corrupted and uh 47:18 narrow-minded and that's what concerns 47:20 me do you think they would say you're 47:22 naive I uh like I want to be naive to to 47:27 the challenges of leadership to the 47:29 challenges of having a you know a voter 47:31 population you sometimes have to be 47:33 certain ways I think we used to have 47:35 like better presidents and leaderships 47:37 in throughout the last century so no I 47:40 don't think I'm too n but I'm definitely 47:42 always a bit I totally agree with you I 47:44 think the state of leadership today is 47:45 woeful um who penultimate one what's 47:48 your biggest short in the public markets 47:51 I not so read well read on the public 47:53 market it would be a SAS company it 47:55 would be like a SAS company that has a 47:57 per seat 47:59 pricing where th those their 48:02 ICP um is going to be replaced by AAS 48:07 that just replaces the employees so the 48:09 the number of SE goes down what's the 48:11 future pricing in an AI world yeah I 48:14 think it depends on how defensible your 48:16 you like your business is if you're 48:19 selling to like Enterprises that never 48:21 change SAS software you should try to 48:24 make some value based pricing I don't 48:26 know how you how you get the good value 48:28 based pricing but I would do something 48:30 like that otherwise I think you should 48:32 should don't innovate so much too much 48:33 on pricing do what do whatever works 48:34 today I love the facial expressions uh 48:37 my my final one I like optimism and I 48:40 think we need more of it in the world 48:42 I'm incredibly excited for the next 48:44 decade because I think we'll find cures 48:46 to my mother's got multiple curosis 48:47 which is a horrible disease I think 48:49 we'll find cures to diseases that we 48:51 really didn't think possible before what 48:54 excites you most about the next decade 48:57 that we have coming I think it's that AI 49:00 is hopefully going to make us humans 49:03 understand each other better and be 49:06 better at doing win-win playing win win 49:09 and that would be awesome I'm excited 49:10 about that so like you our leadership 49:12 actually being um enhanced by super 49:15 intelligent AI Anton listen dude I've so 49:18 enjoyed doing this thank you so much for 49:20 joining me and thank you for inspiring a 49:22 generation of European entrepreneurs 49:24 that they can build unbelievable 49:26 businesses is in Europe thank you har it 49:28 was it was super fun